SARS-CoV-2 と COVID-19 に関するメモ・備忘録
米空軍訓練生の研究で、COVID-19感染が身体能力に与える影響が明らかに:感染者は非感染者より3.6倍体力試験で不合格となりやすく、合格者も次の試験で2.8倍失敗しやすい。隔離中の体力低下も一因。若者の身体への長期的影響に注目が必要https://t.co/V2OjwMey0F
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 18, 2024
隔離中の運動不足が体力低下を悪化させる要因の一つと考えられます。若者の健康に及ぼすCOVID-19の長期的な影響について、さらに理解を深める必要があります。https://t.co/V2OjwMe0b7
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 18, 2024
◆Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Physical Fitness in Air Force Basic Trainees【OXFORD ACADEMIC 2024年12月5日】
Abstract
Introduction
The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on physical fitness in previously healthy adults is not well understood. In this study, we assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the physical fitness test (PT) scores of Air Force basic trainees.
Materials and Methods
SARS-CoV-2 testing data and trainee fitness test scores for the calendar year 2021 were obtained from U.S. Air Force basic military trainees. Trainees perform a standardized fitness test including push-ups, sit-ups, and a 2.4 kilometer run at the beginning and end of their training. For this study, basic trainees who performed 2 fitness tests in 2021 and also tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were defined as the infected cohort. These were 1:1 matched by sex to an uninfected control group of basic trainees. Changes in fitness test scores and pass–fail rates were then compared across the infected and control groups.
Results
A total of 23,450 basic trainees performed a PT in calendar year 2021, 975 (4%) of whom tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. A total of 621 (64%) had completed 2 fitness tests during the defined study period and were included in the infected cohort. There were 96 females (15.5%) in each group and 525 males (84.5%) in each group. There was no difference in body mass index between the infected and the control groups (24.0 [Interquartile range (IQR) 21.8 to 36.0] vs. 24.3 [IQR 21.7–36.9], P = .253). The infected group had a higher rate of failing their PT at the end of training when compared to control (15.7% vs. 4.3%, P < .001). When comparing those who passed their first fitness test and went on to fail their second fitness test, this occurred more frequently in the infected group (2.3% vs. 0.81%, P = .037). When comparing trainees who failed their first fitness test and went on to pass their second fitness test, this occurred more frequently in the control group (46.3% vs. 39.6%, P = .016). Among the infected group, there were no differences in second test failure rates when comparing symptomatic to asymptomatic trainees (16.9% vs. 11.8%, P = .143). Conclusions
SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increased risk of PT failure as well as conversion from a passing to failing test score. There were no differences in second test failure rates in symptomatic compared to asymptomatic trainees. A key confounder to the data was the effect deconditioning had on fitness during isolation.
ロングCOVIDでは、ウイルス感染細胞を攻撃する重要なNK細胞の割合が著しく低下。特に神経症状や疲労との関連が強く、女性ではさらに顕著。免疫異常とウイルス残存がロングCOVIDの要因である可能性が示唆
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 18, 2024
ウイルスが体内に残存し続けることと、免疫システムの乱れがロングCOVIDの一因である可能性があり、治療法開発の必要性が認められます。https://t.co/dxhYNvaMrD
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 18, 2024
◆Long COVID is associated with lower percentages of mature, cytotoxic NK cell phenotypes【The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2024年12月17日】
Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, approximately 5% of individuals develop long COVID (LC), defined as ongoing symptoms present at least 3 months after infection that are disruptive to everyday functioning. There is growing evidence that SARS-CoV-2 persistence is associated with LC and that people with LC have dysregulated adaptive immune function that may originate from or potentiate viral persistence. NK cells, a critical component of the viral innate immune response, can exhibit dysfunctional phenotypes during acute COVID-19, and these alterations may hinder clearance of SARS-CoV-2–infected cells. COVID-19 can also induce adaptive NK cell responses during acute infection, but there is a critical lack of knowledge about NK cell phenotypes in the postacute phase and their relationship to LC.
ゴールデンハムスターを用いた研究で、COVID-19感染が脳幹に長期間ウイルスを残すことが判明。感染後80日間もウイルスが検出され、うつ病や記憶障害、不安症状が持続。神経変性病と似た影響が観察され、ロングCOVIDのメカニズム解明に寄与。https://t.co/MsxxyLT5GP
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 18, 2024
これらの神経変性の影響は、エネルギー代謝の乱れや神経伝達物質の異常、炎症反応が関与していると考えられます。https://t.co/MsxxyLT5GP
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 18, 2024
◆Hamsters with long Covid exhibits a neurodegenerative signature in the brainstem【bioRxiv 2024年12月16日】
Abstract
After infection with SARS-CoV-2, patients may present with one or more symptoms that appear or persist over time, including fatigue, respiratory, cardiovascular and neurological disorders. Neurological symptoms include anxiety, depression and impaired short-term memory. However, the exact underlying mechanisms of long Covid are not yet decrypted. Using the golden hamster as a model, we provide further evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is neuroinvasive and can persist in the central nervous system, as we found viral RNA and replicative virus in the brainstem after 80 days of infection. Infected hamsters presented a neurodegenerative signature in the brainstem, with overexpression of innate immunity genes, impacted dopaminergic and glutamatergic synapses, altered energy metabolism. Finally, the infected hamsters manifested persistent signs of depression and impaired short-term memory, as well as late-onset signs of anxiety, as a valuable model to study long Covid. Conclusively, we provide evidence that virus-related and neurodegenerative and immunometabolic mechanisms coexist in the brainstem of infected hamsters and contribute to the manifestation of neuropsychiatric and cognitive symptoms.
ロングCOVIDの研究で、運動や軽い労力後に症状が悪化する「努力後不調(PEM)」が確認されました。筋肉のミトコンドリア異常や酸素利用の問題が影響。治療法はまだ確立されていませんが、免疫療法やサプリの臨床試験が進行中https://t.co/dtX2nQVyqr
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
このため、多くの患者が疲れや脳の霧(ブレインフォグ)を訴えています。現在、有効な治療法はありませんが、免疫療法や抗炎症薬、サプリメントを使用した治療の臨床試験が進行中です。https://t.co/dtX2nQVyqr
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
◆Skeletal muscle adaptations and post-exertional malaise in long COVID【Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 2024年12月17日】
Highlights
Long COVID occurs when symptoms persist for more than 3 months after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Symptoms include fatigue, brain fog, myalgia, and post-exertional malaise (PEM), which worsens with physical, mental, or cognitive exertion.
Long COVID shares many characteristics with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), particularly PEM, which is necessary for ME/CFS diagnosis.
Long COVID is associated with intrinsic skeletal muscle mitochondrial dysfunction, endothelial abnormalities, and a shift towards more glycolytic muscle fibers, which contribute to a lower exercise capacity.
Several potential mechanisms may explain skeletal muscle abnormalities in long COVID, including local hypoxia, deconditioning, autoimmunity, electrophysiological changes, and central fatigue.
There are no treatments for long COVID or PEM, but ongoing trials include immunoadsorption, dietary supplements, and anti-inflammatory/antiviral drugs.Abstract
When acute SARS-CoV-2 infections cause symptoms that persist longer than 3 months, this condition is termed long COVID. Symptoms experienced by patients often include myalgia, fatigue, brain fog, cognitive impairments, and post-exertional malaise (PEM), which is the worsening of symptoms following mental or physical exertion. There is little consensus on the pathophysiology of exercise-induced PEM and skeletal-muscle-related symptoms. In this opinion article we highlight intrinsic mitochondrial dysfunction, endothelial abnormalities, and a muscle fiber type shift towards a more glycolytic phenotype as main contributors to the reduced exercise capacity in long COVID. The mechanistic trigger for physical exercise to induce PEM is unknown, but rapid skeletal muscle tissue damage and intramuscular infiltration of immune cells contribute to PEM-related symptoms.
COVID-19に関連したギラン・バレー症候群(GBS)が8歳の男児で発症。脳神経(第3、第7、第9)が侵され、顔面麻痺や四肢脱力を発症。肺の症状がない中で神経系への影響が明らかに。このウイルスの神経侵襲性が再び浮き彫りにhttps://t.co/U4qAnuabom
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
この症例では肺の症状は見られず、COVID-19が神経系を直接攻撃する可能性が再確認されました。このウイルスの神経侵襲性に注目が必要です。https://t.co/U4qAnuabom
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
◆A Rare Pediatric Case of COVID-19-Associated Guillain-Barré Syndrome With Multiple Cranial Neuropathies and Without Pulmonary Symptoms【Cureus Journal of Medical Science 2024年12月18日】
Abstract
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that primarily affects the respiratory system but can also lead to neurological complications such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This case report describes an eight-year-old boy with COVID-19-associated GBS involving multiple cranial nerves (third, seventh, and ninth) without pulmonary symptoms. The patient initially presented with flu-like symptoms along with right facial paralysis, which progressed to bilateral facial paralysis, limb weakness, and sensory loss. Neurologic examination revealed a loss of deep tendon reflexes, while cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed albuminocytologic dissociation. The SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was positive in the nasopharyngeal swab but negative in the cerebrospinal fluid. The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and showed marked improvement, regaining the ability to walk unassisted within a week. This case highlights the neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrates that COVID-19 in pediatric patients can be associated with neurological complications such as GBS, even without respiratory symptoms.
先週と昨日で、コロナウイルスがただの風邪と違う点、初代SARSと新型コロナウイルスの違いは感染力だということを書きました。しかし、インフルエンザと新型コロナウイルスを同一と捉えることの致命的なリスクが一般にあまり知られていないので、ここで説明したいと思います。インフルエンザと
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
コロナウイルス種の最も危険な違いの一つは、複製場所です。コロナウイルスは昨日書いたように「複製複合体」を作ってその中でRNAを複製します。そして、多くの場合感染した細胞内には無数の「複製複合体」が作られ、その全ての中で同時並行でRNA複製が行われます。このウイルスは細胞に侵入すると、
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
「殻」の中から「やわらかいタンパク質」を放出します。そのうちの2つのNSP3と4は、小胞体に着地したあと、自らをそこにアンカー打設します。そして、「ひだひだ」が多くある粗面小胞体という部分から、この「ひだひだ」を引き延ばし、ドームを形成します。これが「複製複合体」になります。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
細胞小器官自体の膜を利用しているため、免疫反応を起こしません。このドームの角で、RNAを複製するタンパク質に、RNAを送り込むタンパク質、そして移動を調整するタンパク質、最後に二本鎖を一本鎖にほどく”やわらかいタンパク質”が精密に配置されます。しかし、この
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
一本鎖にほどく段階では非常に高いエネルギーが必要です。3Dプリンターが高容量バッテリーに接続されているように、小胞体は通常、専用のミトコンドリアと直接つながっています。このウイルスは、小胞体と繋がったミトコンドリアから直接ATP(生物のエネルギー源)を奪い、RNAをほどく作業に転用します
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
そして、小胞体の表面にはRNAを翻訳してタンパク質にするリボソームが元々多く存在するため、これらにウイルスRNAを輸送します。コロナウイルスは現在までに知られているどのウイルスよりも精密な複製複合体を形成し、特に新型コロナウイルスは初代SARSよりもさらにタンパク質同士の接続を緊密にして
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
効率を高めています。一方、インフルエンザも同様に「複製複合体」を作りますが、細胞核に繋がって不安定に漂う形になっています。細胞には1つしか細胞核がないため、複製は1か所でしか行われません。つまり、細胞内に「複製複合体」を充満させて同時並行でRNAを複製するコロナウイルスと比較すると、
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
圧倒的にヌクレオチドの消費も、ATPの流用も少なくなります。コロナウイルスのタンパク質は小胞体などにアンカー打設されるため、感染回復後も長く細胞内に留まり、活動を続けます。そのため、ヌクレオチドの長期的な不足、ミトコンドリアの損傷などはインフルエンザと比較にならず、DNA修復とATPを
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
特に多く必要とする心臓では心筋症、虚血再灌流障害、拡張型心筋症または不整脈に繋がります。また、コロナウイルスの「複製複合体」にはまだ分かっていないことが多くあります。複製したRNAをどうリボソームに運ぶのか、複合体表面にチャネルはあるのか、ATPをミトコンドリアから具体的にどう輸送して
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
いるのか。そして特に、「複製複合体」の周囲でとぐろを巻く「チューブ状」の構造物はどのようにして作られ、一体何をしているのか、などです。チューブ状の構造は初代でも僅かに観察されましたが、新型になってから爆発的に増加したため、何らかの選択圧が生み出した可能性もありますが、
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
電子顕微鏡の限界や複製速度の速さから、いまだに多くが謎に包まれています。このチューブ状構造物を形成するウイルスはインフルエンザも含めて他に見つかっていません。筆者も、「複製複合体」の内部がRNA安定化に適した酸性に傾いている可能性が高いため、プロトンポンプなどを果たすチャネルが表面
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
に存在している場合、そこを標的にした治療法が見つからないかなどかなり調べましたが、現在それらに関する確定的なことはまだ分かっていません。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
咳、発熱、関節の痛みなどの最末端の症状の類似性だけをとり、インフルエンザと新型コロナウイルスの本質的な違い(複製場所が「一か所」VS「無数」)を無視すると、感染後の長期的な影響を調べるのが困難になります。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
まとめ
インフルエンザは一か所でしか増殖しないが、新型コロナウイルスは無数の箇所で同時並行で増殖する。また、新型コロナウイルスはインフルエンザよりもRNAが約3倍長いため、ヌクレオチドやATPの消費が圧倒的に速く、細胞への長期的な負担が非常に大きい。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
https://t.co/6DDWhwlDE8https://t.co/30Tc5qyO3Jhttps://t.co/xt4r7SmQnXhttps://t.co/HShqcCCzVghttps://t.co/4OMOl0bqFFhttps://t.co/WwV69UFqIThttps://t.co/H0PWAQ6x8Rhttps://t.co/raYzhWJyDU
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
◆SARS-CoV-2 Causes Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Mitophagy Impairment【Frontiers in Microbiology 2022年1月6日】
Mitochondria, which is essential for adequate innate immune response, energy metabolism and mitochondria reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, might be in the cross fire of Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and host cell defense. However, little is known about interactions between mitochondria and SARS-CoV-2. We performed fluorescent microscopy and found an enrichment of SARS-CoV-2 replication products double stranded RNA (dsRNA) within mitochondria. The entry process of dsRNA might be mediated by Tom20 as observed by reduced mitochondrial localization of SARS-CoV-2 dsRNA in Tom20 knockdown cells. Importantly, decreased mitochondrial localization of dsRNA, as well as mitochondrial membrane stabilizers mdivi-1 and cyclosporin A, inhibited viral load in cells. Next, we detected mitochondrial dysfunction caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, including mitochondrial membrane depolarization, mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and increased ROS release. In response to mitochondrial damage, we observed an increase in expression and mitochondrial accumulation of Pink1 and Parkin proteins, as well as Pink-1-mediated recruitment of P62 to mitochondria, suggesting initiated mitophagy for mitochondrial quality control and virus clearance. Nevertheless, we observed that mitophagy was inhibited and stayed in early stage with an unchanged Hsp60 expression post SARS-CoV-2 infection. This might be one of the anti-autophagy strategies of SARS-CoV-2 and we used co-immunoprecipitation to found that SARS-CoV-2 infection inhibited P62 and LC3 binding which plays a critical role in selective envelopment of substrates into autophagosomes. Our results suggest that mitochondria are closely involved in SARS-CoV-2 replication and mitochondrial homeostasis is disrupted by SARS-CoV-2 in the virus-cell confrontation.
◆How the Replication and Transcription Complex Functions in Jumping Transcription of SARS-CoV-2【Frontiers in Microbiology 2022年5月30日】
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although unprecedented efforts are underway to develop therapeutic strategies against this disease, scientists have acquired only a little knowledge regarding the structures and functions of the CoV replication and transcription complex (RTC). Ascertaining all the RTC components and the arrangement of them is an indispensably step for the eventual determination of its global structure, leading to completely understanding all of its functions at the molecular level.
Results: The main results include: 1) hairpins containing the canonical and non-canonical NSP15 cleavage motifs are canonical and non-canonical transcription regulatory sequence (TRS) hairpins; 2) TRS hairpins can be used to identify recombination regions in CoV genomes; 3) RNA methylation participates in the determination of the local RNA structures in CoVs by affecting the formation of base pairing; and 4) The eventual determination of the CoV RTC global structure needs to consider METTL3 in the experimental design.
Conclusions: In the present study, we proposed the theoretical arrangement of NSP12-15 and METTL3 in the global RTC structure and constructed a model to answer how the RTC functions in the jumping transcription of CoVs. As the most important finding, TRS hairpins were reported for the first time to interpret NSP15 cleavage, RNA methylation of CoVs and their association at the molecular level. Our findings enrich fundamental knowledge in the field of gene expression and its regulation, providing a crucial basis for future studies.
◆Pathophysiological involvement of host mitochondria in SARS-CoV-2 infection that causes COVID-19: a comprehensive evidential insight【SPRINGER NATURE 2022年10月29日】
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 is a positive-strand RNA virus that infects humans through the nasopharyngeal and oral route causing COVID-19. Scientists left no stone unturned to explore a targetable key player in COVID-19 pathogenesis against which therapeutic interventions can be initiated. This article has attempted to review, coordinate and accumulate the most recent observations in support of the hypothesis predicting the altered state of mitochondria concerning mitochondrial redox homeostasis, inflammatory regulations, morphology, bioenergetics and antiviral signalling in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mitochondria is extremely susceptible to physiological as well as pathological stimuli, including viral infections. Recent studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 pathogeneses alter mitochondrial integrity, in turn mitochondria modulate cellular response against the infection. SARS-CoV-2 M protein inhibited mitochondrial antiviral signalling (MAVS) protein aggregation in turn hinders innate antiviral response. Viral open reading frames (ORFs) also play an instrumental role in altering mitochondrial regulation of immune response. Notably, ORF-9b and ORF-6 impair MAVS activation. In aged persons, the NLRP3 inflammasome is over-activated due to impaired mitochondrial function, increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS), and/or circulating free mitochondrial DNA, resulting in a hyper-response of classically activated macrophages. This article also tries to understand how mitochondrial fission–fusion dynamics is affected by the virus. This review comprehends the overall mitochondrial attribute in pathogenesis as well as prognosis in patients infected with COVID-19 taking into account pertinent in vitro, pre-clinical and clinical data encompassing subjects with a broad range of severity and morbidity. This endeavour may help in exploring novel non-canonical therapeutic strategies to COVID-19 disease and associated complications.
◆SARS-CoV-2 can cause lasting damage to cells’ energy production【National Institutes of Health 2023年8月22日】
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the virus responsible for the disease, SARS-CoV-2, was feared for its devastating damage to the lungs. But it quickly became apparent that the virus can infect organs and tissues throughout the body, including the heart, brain, kidneys, and blood vessels.
Much of the resulting dysfunction was thought to be the result of inflammation, the immune system’s response to infection. But research has suggested that effects on mitochondria may also play a role in organ damage from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of cells, producing most of the energy they need.
It’s been known that parts of SARS-CoV-2 bind to proteins in the mitochondria. But how this affects mitochondrial function hasn’t been clear. Dr. Afshin Beheshti, president of the nonprofit COVID-19 International Research Team and visiting researcher at Broad Institute, and Dr. Douglas Wallace from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia led an international team, including NIH researchers, to look more closely at the phenomenon.
The researchers compared mitochondrial gene expression€”when genes were activated€”in tissue samples taken from the nasopharynx of 216 people with COVID-19 and 519 uninfected people. They also looked at mitochondrial function in autopsy samples from the hearts, kidneys, livers, lungs, and lymph nodes of 35 people who died from COVID-19 compared with that from 5 people who died from other causes. The results were published on August 9, 2023, in Science Translational Medicine.
The team found that the expression of mitochondrial genes involved in energy production was suppressed in the nasopharynx during acute infection. This shifted cells into a state where they produced more of the substances the virus needs for replication. The researchers did not find this suppression in lung tissue samples taken after the virus had been cleared from the body.
Tissue samples taken during autopsies from the heart, kidney, liver, and lymph nodes continued to show suppression of these mitochondrial genes long after the virus had been cleared from the body. The reason for this continued suppression is unclear. In tandem with reduced mitochondrial function in these tissues, the researchers saw an upregulation of genes related to cellular stress.
“The continued dysfunction we observed in organs other than the lungs suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction could be causing long-term damage to the internal organs of these patients,” Wallace says.
The team next used hamsters and mice to track mitochondrial function over the entire course of infection with SARS-CoV-2. They saw similar results in these animal models. Mitochondrial energy production was suppressed in the lungs during early SARS-CoV-2 infection, then bounced back once the immune system brought the virus under control. During early infection, mitochondrial gene expression was altered in the brain even though no SARS-CoV-2 was detected there, consistent with a systemic response to the virus.
The researchers also found a potential new target for treatment. They found that SARS-CoV-2 boosted expression of a regulatory molecule called miR-2392. This, in turn, lowered expression of mitochondrial genes involved in energy production.
“Neutralizing this microRNA might be able to impede the replication of the virus, providing an additional therapeutic option for patients who are at risk for more serious complications related to the disease,” Beheshti says.
COVID-19をただの風邪やインフルエンザと同一視することで見落とされるリスクは多くあります。臨床の現場と分子生物学の知見を結びつけることで、患者様へのより良いアプローチが可能になると信じています。その鍵となるのが『複製複合体』の解明。科学的背景をもっと広めていきたいと思います。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
(日常語版)
新型コロナウイルス vs インフルエンザ: 決定的な違い新型コロナウイルスとインフルエンザは、咳や発熱などの症状が似ているため、同じような病気だと誤解されることがあります。しかし、実際には両者の体内での行動は大きく異なります。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
特に注目すべきなのは、「ウイルスがどこで複製されるか」という点です。
新型コロナウイルスの巧妙な複製メカニズム
コロナウイルスは、細胞内の小器官である小胞体を改造し、「複製複合体」という特殊な構造を作ります。この複合体の中でRNAが効率的に複製されるため、1つの細胞内で無数の複製が— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
同時に行われます。複合体は二重膜で覆われ、免疫の目を逃れる仕組みです。さらに、ミトコンドリアからATP(エネルギー)を奪い、複製に必要なエネルギーを供給しています。
一方、インフルエンザウイルスは、細胞核内で不安定な複製構造を作り、複製は1か所でしか行われません。そのため、— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
消費されるエネルギーや細胞リソースの量がコロナウイルスに比べてはるかに少ないのです。
長期的な影響の違い
新型コロナウイルスは、インフルエンザと比べて以下のような長期的な影響を引き起こすリスクが高まります:— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
DNAの損傷と修復不全: RNA複製の膨大なエネルギー消費により、DNAの修復が追いつかなくなる。
ミトコンドリアの損傷: 細胞のエネルギー不足を引き起こし、心臓や脳への負担が増加。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
複製複合体の未知の構造: 新型コロナウイルス特有のチューブ状構造物の役割がまだ解明されておらず、これが長期的な病原性にどのように関与しているのかは今後の研究課題です。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
同じ呼吸器症状を示すからといって、両者を同じものと捉えることは危険です。新型コロナウイルスはその複製戦略において、インフルエンザとは大きく異なり、より持続的かつ深刻な影響を及ぼす可能性があります。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
https://t.co/6DDWhwlDE8https://t.co/30Tc5qyO3Jhttps://t.co/xt4r7SmQnXhttps://t.co/HShqcCCzVghttps://t.co/4OMOl0bqFFhttps://t.co/WwV69UFqIThttps://t.co/H0PWAQ6x8Rhttps://t.co/raYzhWJyDU
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 19, 2024
修正版ツイート:
先日のこのツイートで、1点誤解を生じさせたようなので訂正します。(新型)コロナウイルスは、細胞侵入後、細胞内に広がる一つの小胞体(ER)の特定の領域、特に粗面小胞体(RER)を引き伸ばし、複製複合体(RTC)を形成します。この複製複合体は、細胞中に無数作られるため、 https://t.co/rXsMJqcTMr— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
それぞれが同時並行してRNA複製を進めるという特徴を持ちます。一つの複製複合体の中には、RNA複製マシン(NSP12/7/8)が単体もしくは2~4個ほど含まれていると推測されています。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
まとめ(微修正後)
インフルエンザは細胞核内の一か所でしか増殖を行わないが、新型コロナウイルスは小胞体の特定の領域(粗面小胞体)に無数の複製複合体(RTC)を形成し、それぞれで同時並行で増殖を行う。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
また、新型コロナウイルスのRNAはインフルエンザの約3倍の長さがあり、このためヌクレオチドやATPの消費が圧倒的に速く、細胞に与える長期的な負担が非常に大きい。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
新たな研究で、COVID-19感染後にロングCOVIDを引き起こす免疫経路が性別ごとに異なることが判明しました。共通点(単球の活性化)もありますが、男性ではTGF-β増加、女性ではXIST遺伝子の発現増加が重要な役割を果たすことが示されました。https://t.co/mCPf0hTpiH
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
TGF-βの発現が減少し、XISTという自己免疫に関連するRNA遺伝子が増加することが分かりました。性別に基づいた治療法の開発が重要です。https://t.co/mCPf0hTX8f
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
◆Sex differences and immune correlates of Long Covid development, symptom persistence, and resolution【Science Translational Medicine 2024年11月13日】
Abstract
Sex differences have been observed in acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Long Covid (LC) outcomes, with greater disease severity and mortality during acute infection in males and greater proportions of females developing LC. We hypothesized that sex-specific immune dysregulation contributes to LC pathogenesis. To investigate the immunologic underpinnings of LC development and symptom persistence, we performed multiomic analyses on blood samples obtained during acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and 3 and 12 months after infection in a cohort of 45 participants who either developed LC or recovered. Several sex-specific immune pathways were associated with LC. Males who would later develop LC exhibited increases in transforming growth factor–β (TGF-β) signaling during acute infection, whereas females who would go on to develop LC had reduced TGFB1 expression. Females who developed LC demonstrated increased expression of XIST, an RNA gene implicated in autoimmunity, during acute infection compared with females who recovered. Many immune features of LC were also conserved across sexes, such as alterations in monocyte phenotype and activation state. Nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) transcription factors were up-regulated in many cell types at acute and convalescent time points. Those with ongoing LC demonstrated reduced ETS1 expression across lymphocyte subsets and elevated intracellular IL-4 in T cell subsets, suggesting that ETS1 alterations may drive aberrantly elevated T helper cell 2–like responses in LC. Altogether, this study describes multiple innate and adaptive immune correlates of LC, some of which differ by sex, and offers insights toward the pursuit of tailored therapeutics.
COVID-19は新たな潰瘍性大腸炎(UC)の引き金になったり、既存患者の症状を悪化させる可能性があります。研究ではUC患者がCOVID-19に感染した場合、症状が重症化するリスクが高まることが明らかに。UCとウイルス感染の相互作用に注目が必要
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
この研究は、UCとウイルス感染が相互に影響を与え合う可能性を示しています。https://t.co/KjxMcse4rJ
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
◆Can COVID-19 Cause Ulcerative Colitis or Make Symptoms Worse?【healthline 2024年12月18日】
COVID-19 might be a trigger for new ulcerative colitis for some people. It may also be a trigger for symptom flare-ups for people previously diagnosed with UC.
COVID-19 is a respiratory illness caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2. It primarily causes respiratory symptoms, but it’s well-established that it can also affect other parts of your body, such as your gastrointestinal tract.
Research suggests that COVID-19 and other viral infections may contribute to the development of ulcerative colitis in some genetically prone people. Viral infections are also a common trigger for symptom flare-ups.
Let’s examine what’s known about the connection between COVID-19 and ulcerative colitis.
Can COVID-19 cause ulcerative colitis?
Ulcerative colitis is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that occurs when the immune system attacks the lining of the large intestine. The course of the disease usually alternates between periods where symptoms flare up and periods where symptoms decrease.
The underlying cause of ulcerative colitis isn’t known, but some people are thought to be more genetically prone when exposed to certain environmental factors.
When you get a virus, your immune system triggers the release of molecules like cytokines that lead to inflammation throughout your body. Dysregulation of your immune system is a potential trigger of ulcerative colitis. In reverse, people with ulcerative colitis seem to be at higher risk of viral infections.
Additionally, COVID-19 and other viral infections cause psychological stress for some people, and stress is a known trigger for ulcerative colitis symptoms.
What research shows
Although many viral infections may trigger ulcerative colitis, it has also been specifically linked to COVID-19.
In a 2022 study, researchers reported two cases of IBD diagnosed shortly after recovery from COVID-19. In the first case, a 37-year-old male developed symptoms of ulcerative colitis 2 months after recovering from a COVID-19 infection that required a short course of steroids.
The second case was a 64-year-old male who developed a form of ulcerative colitis called proctosigmoiditis.
In another case report, researchers reported a 74-year-old male who developed new ulcerative colitis a month after having COVID-19.
In a 2024 review of studies, researchers examined the connection between ulcerative colitis and COVID-19 in a sample of 224,520 people from 19 studies. The researchers found that the overall risk of hospitalization in people with COVID-19 and ulcerative colitis was 28% higher than in the general population. The chances of getting severe COVID-19 were 30% higher.
Can COVID-19 make ulcerative colitis worse?
Some people can experience ulcerative colitis flare-ups with confirmed COVID-19 infection. For example, in a 2022 study, researchers reported two cases of people who experienced mild and severe symptom flare-ups associated with COVID-19 infection.
In a 2024 study, researchers found statistically significant evidence of an association between COVID-19 and either ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease flare-ups. Crohn’s disease is another type of IBD.
Can COVID-19 vaccines cause UC or worsen symptoms?
Vaccines come with some risks. Evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in the United States have a much smaller risk of complications than COVID-19 infection, but some serious side effects have been reported, such as:
- anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction)
- myocarditis (heart inflammation)
- pericarditis (inflammation of tissue that surrounds the heart)
Receiving a COVID-19 vaccine can help prevent serious infection in people with ulcerative colitis, since they may be more likely to develop severe infection.
In rare cases, it’s plausible that vaccination could trigger ulcerative colitis by modulating immune activity. For example, researchers reported a suspected caseTrusted Source in a 37-year-old woman in Japan after her third vaccination dose.
However, the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks in people with IBD, and those with IBD can have much more severe infections of COVID-19.
How to protect against COVID-19 if you have ulcerative colitis
People with ulcerative colitis seem to be more susceptible to viral infections than people without ulcerative colitis. Ways you can help prevent COVID-19 infection include:
- receiving COVID-19 vaccination
- receiving vaccination for other infections that could weaken immune activity, such as influenza
- avoiding symptom triggers
- taking UC medications as prescribed
- washing your hands regularly and thoroughly with soapy water
- avoiding physical contact with sick people when possible
- avoiding areas where you might be susceptible to infection, such as public transport, when possible
- wearing a mask in areas where you have a high risk of COVID-19 infection
When to contact a doctor
It’s important to speak with a doctor if you have potential symptoms of ulcerative colitis without a known cause, such as persistent and unexplained abdominal pain and diarrhea. You should also consult a healthcare professional if your symptoms are getting worse or you develop new symptoms.
The American Medical Association Trusted Source recommends getting emergency medical attention for COVID-19 if you or somebody you’re with has:
- trouble breathing
- persistent chest pain or pressure
- new confusion
- trouble walking or staying awake
- pale, gray, or blue-colored skin, lips, or nail beds, which may be more difficult to spot on darker skin tones
Takeaway
COVID-19 and other viral infections appear to be a potential trigger for ulcerative colitis for some people. In reverse, having ulcerative colitis seems to make you more susceptible to viral infections.
COVID-19 vaccines also seem to trigger ulcerative colitis symptoms for a small number of people. However, the potential benefits of vaccination for people with ulcerative colitis outweigh the risks for most.
今日書き損ねましたが、初代SARSに比べて新型コロナウイルスが感染を最適化している点はスパイクプロテインの関節の他にピークウイルス量のタイミングの違いがあります。
初代:発症の10日後
新型:発症の2-4日前
です。まだ咳をしていない人のウイルス量が最大になっています。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 18, 2024
「COVIDやロングCOVIDを考えるときに無視していいポイント」
COVIDやロングCOVIDについて、すべてを考えようとすると疲れてしまいます。しかし、次のことは「気にしなくてもいい」ものです。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
1 「パンデミックは終わるのか?」という問い
未来の全てを予測することはできませんが、今できる行動に集中することで、少しずつ前に進むことができます。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
2 「全員がロングコロナになるのか?」という不安
すべての人が同じ影響を受けるわけではありません。予防策や早期対応で、自分自身の健康を守ることができます。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
3 ウイルス株の違い
どの株であれ、マスクや換気、距離を保つといった基本的な感染対策が有効です。株名や特徴に深く気を取られる必要はありません。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
4 全ての後遺症の詳細
他人の症状すべてを知る必要はありません。自分の体調や生活に影響していることだけに集中すれば十分です。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
現在、COVID研究はあらゆる方向で行われており、矛盾する結果が多くあります。一つの研究結果や有名な研究に過度に依存するのではなく、自分の体調や「身体的な範囲」に焦点を当てましょう。これが、確実な改善への近道です。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
「恐れる必要はありません。」
これまでの投稿でコロナウイルスの複雑な仕組みやリスクについてお話ししてきましたが、これらは「恐怖」を煽るためではありません。
私は、ウイルスや病気を「恐れる必要はない」と考えています。
なぜなら、— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
仕組みを知れば、リスクを回避する方法が見えてくるからです。
重要なのは、理論的に仕組みを理解し、合理的なステップを取ることです。 恐れに支配されるのではなく、知識を力に変えましょう。コロナウイルスも、メカニズムを理解すれば「対応可能な課題」として捉えることができます。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
(新型)コロナウイルスについて、他の病気との混同などによる誤解があることが分かったのでQ&Aの形で説明します。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
1. コロナウイルスは細胞内で活動するのですか?
答 違います。コロナウイルスは細胞に入ったときに、29個の部品(タンパク質)に分かれて、それぞれ独自に、しかし協調しながら活動を始めます。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
2.コロナウイルスのRNAは細胞核で複製されますか?
答 違います。コロナウイルスは「複製複合体」というドームを細胞の中に無数に作り、その中で同時並行してRNAを複製します。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
3.抗ウイルス薬を飲めばコロナウイルスは細胞から消えますか?
答 消えません。代表的なウイルス薬は、脂肪膜を透過できる薬を伴って体に入ります。これが一定以上の濃度を保ったまま「複製複合体」に入れば、その複合体の中のRNA複製の一部を止められますが、すでに複製されたRNAやサブゲノムRNA、— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
タンパク質に翻訳されたものは破壊されず、細胞の中に残ります。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
4.栄養を摂ればコロナウイルスに奪われた分を回復できますか?
答 ヌクレオチドやATPなどの重要な要素は、細胞によって一から作られなければなりません。そのためには、細胞内から一定数以上のウイルスタンパク質を除去して細胞を応援する必要があります。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
5.スパイクへの抗体は細胞内のウイルスタンパク質を除去しますか?
答 スパイクプロテイン以外の28個の部品は抗体に反応せず、また細胞外の免疫反応は細胞内には影響しないので、これらのウイルスタンパク質はオートファジー機能によってしか除去されません。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
6.細胞が分裂すればウイルスタンパク質は自然に消えますか?
答 消えません。ウイルスタンパク質は娘細胞に引き継がれます。これは、タンパク質が細胞分裂によって破壊されるわけではないためです。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
7.細胞内に残ったウイルスタンパク質が他人に感染することはありますか?
答 通常はありません。細胞内のタンパク質が細胞外に漏洩することは極めて稀で、仮に漏洩しても、スパイク以外の28種類のタンパク質は感染性を持ちません。— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
https://t.co/S8MOTzK0Eqhttps://t.co/FJ9Tia2qEPhttps://t.co/lZ3UMTPhVahttps://t.co/BpMATSmxHshttps://t.co/ev52pePr3Mhttps://t.co/cvyEKmUvQk
— Angama (@Angama_Market) December 20, 2024
◆Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2【nature reviews microbiology 2020年10月28日】
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and its unprecedented global societal and economic disruptive impact has marked the third zoonotic introduction of a highly pathogenic coronavirus into the human population. Although the previous coronavirus SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV epidemics raised awareness of the need for clinically available therapeutic or preventive interventions, to date, no treatments with proven efficacy are available. The development of effective intervention strategies relies on the knowledge of molecular and cellular mechanisms of coronavirus infections, which highlights the significance of studying virus–host interactions at the molecular level to identify targets for antiviral intervention and to elucidate critical viral and host determinants that are decisive for the development of severe disease. In this Review, we summarize the first discoveries that shape our current understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection throughout the intracellular viral life cycle and relate that to our knowledge of coronavirus biology. The elucidation of similarities and differences between SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses will support future preparedness and strategies to combat coronavirus infections.
◆The Role of Immunomodulatory Nutrients in Alleviating Complications Related to SARS-CoV-2: A Scoping Review【Advances in Nutrition 2021年10月20日】
Abstract
The recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has warranted the need to investigate potential therapies or prophylaxis against this infectious respiratory disease. There is emerging evidence about the potential role of nutrients on COVID-19 in addition to using medications such as hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. This scoping review aims to explore the literature evaluating the effect of immunomodulatory nutrients on the outcomes including hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, oxygen requirement, and mortality in COVID-19 patients. A literature search of databases including Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and PubMed, as well as hand-searching in Google Scholar (up to 10 February 2021) was conducted. All human studies with different study designs and without limitation on publication year were included except for non-English-language and review articles. Overall, out of 4412 studies, 19 met our inclusion criteria. Four studies examined the impact of supplementation with vitamin C, 4 studies – zinc, 8 studies – vitamin D, and 3 studies investigated the combination of 2 (zinc and vitamin C) or 3 (vitamin D, vitamin B-12, and magnesium) nutrients. Although limited data exist, available evidence demonstrated that supplementation with immune-supportive micronutrients such as vitamins D and C and zinc may modulate immunity and alleviate the severity and risk of infection. The effectiveness of vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc on COVID-19 was different based on baseline nutrient status, the duration and dosage of nutrient therapy, time of administration, and severity of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease. This review indicated that supplementation with high-dose vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc may alleviate the complications caused by COVID-19, including inflammatory markers, oxygen therapy, length of hospitalization, and mortality; however, studies were mixed regarding these effects. Further randomized clinical trials are necessary to identify the most effective nutrients and the safe dosage to combat SARS-CoV-2.
◆Cleavage of the selective autophagy receptor SQSTM1/p62 by the SARS-CoV-2 main protease NSP5 prevents the autophagic degradation of viral membrane proteins【SPRINGER NATURE 2022年6月3日】
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. Omicron, a new variant of SARS-CoV-2, has the characteristics of strong transmission and pathogenicity, short incubation period, and rapid onset progression, and has spread rapidly around the world. The high replication rate and intracellular accumulation of SARS-CoV-2 are remarkable, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Autophagy acts as a conservative cellular defence mechanism against invading pathogens. Here, we provide evidence that the main protease of SARS-CoV-2, NSP5, effectively cleaves the selective autophagy receptor p62. NSP5 targets p62 for cleavage at glutamic acid 354 and thus abolishes the capacity of p62 to mediate selective autophagy. It was further shown that p62 specifically interacted with ubiquitinated SARS-CoV-2 M, the viral membrane protein, to promote its autophagic degradation. In the presence of NSP5, p62-mediated autophagic degradation of the M protein was inhibited. The cleaved products of p62 also cannot facilitate the degradation of the M protein. Collectively, our findings reveal that p62 is a novel host target of SARS-CoV-2 NSP5 and suggest that selective autophagy targets viruses and potential strategies by which the virus evades autophagic clearance. Our results may provide new ideas for the development of anti-COVID-19 drugs based on autophagy and NSP5.
◆Role and clinical implication of autophagy in COVID-19【BMC Virology Journal 2023年6月16日】
Abstract
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic constitutes a serious public health concern worldwide. Currently, more than 6 million deaths have occurred despite drastic containment measures, and this number is still increasing. Currently, no standard therapies for COVID-19 are available, which necessitates identifying effective preventive and therapeutic agents against COVID-19. However, developing new drugs and vaccines is a time-consuming process, and therefore, repurposing the existing drugs or redeveloping related targets seems to be the best strategy to develop effective therapeutics against COVID-19. Autophagy, a multistep lysosomal degradation pathway contributing to nutrient recycling and metabolic adaptation, is involved in the initiation and progression of numerous diseases as a part of an immune response. The key role of autophagy in antiviral immunity has been extensively studied. Moreover, autophagy can directly eliminate intracellular microorganisms by selective autophagy, that is, “xenophagy.” However, viruses have acquired diverse strategies to exploit autophagy for their infection and replication. This review aims to trigger the interest in the field of autophagy as an antiviral target for viral pathogens (with an emphasis on COVID-19). We base this hypothesis on summarizing the classification and structure of coronaviruses as well as the process of SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication; providing the common understanding of autophagy; reviewing interactions between the mechanisms of viral entry/replication and the autophagy pathways; and discussing the current state of clinical trials of autophagy-modifying drugs in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We anticipate that this review will contribute to the rapid development of therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19.
◆Remdesivir is a direct-acting antiviral that inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 with high potency【Journal of Biological Chemistry 2020年4月13日】
Abstract
Effective treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are urgently needed to control this current pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Replication of SARS-CoV-2 depends on the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which is the likely target of the investigational nucleotide analogue remdesivir (RDV). RDV shows broad-spectrum antiviral activity against RNA viruses, and previous studies with RdRps from Ebola virus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) have revealed that delayed chain termination is RDV’s plausible mechanism of action. Here, we expressed and purified active SARS-CoV-2 RdRp composed of the nonstructural proteins nsp8 and nsp12. Enzyme kinetics indicated that this RdRp efficiently incorporates the active triphosphate form of RDV (RDV-TP) into RNA. Incorporation of RDV-TP at position i caused termination of RNA synthesis at position i+3. We obtained almost identical results with SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 RdRps. A unique property of RDV-TP is its high selectivity over incorporation of its natural nucleotide counterpart ATP. In this regard, the triphosphate forms of 2′-C-methylated compounds, including sofosbuvir, approved for the management of hepatitis C virus infection, and the broad-acting antivirals favipiravir and ribavirin, exhibited significant deficits. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the target specificity of RDV, as RDV-TP was less efficiently incorporated by the distantly related Lassa virus RdRp, and termination of RNA synthesis was not observed. These results collectively provide a unifying, refined mechanism of RDV-mediated RNA synthesis inhibition in coronaviruses and define this nucleotide analogue as a direct-acting antiviral.
◆Bidirectional interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and autophagy【ASM Journals 2023年7月12日】
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), as the causative agent of the recent COVID-19 pandemic, continues representing one of the main health concerns worldwide. Autophagy, in addition to its role in cellular homeostasis and metabolism, plays an important part for the host antiviral immunity. However, viruses including SARS-CoV-2 have evolved diverse mechanisms to not only overcome autophagy’s antiviral pressure but also manipulate its machinery in order to enhance viral replication and propagation. Here, we discuss our current knowledge on the impact that autophagy exerts on SARS-CoV-2 replication, as well as the different counteracting measures that this virus has developed to manipulate autophagy’s complex machinery. Some of the elements regarding this interplay may become future therapeutic targets in the fight against SARS-CoV-2.
