SARS-CoV-2 と COVID-19 に関するメモ・備忘録
カナダ・アルバータ州、Long COVIDの影響が5年経っても深刻
-住民の10%が後遺症、2%(約8.8万人)が働けないほど深刻
-専門外来が閉鎖され、治療待機が2年に
「前例のない社会的規模で起きている」(Raj教授)https://t.co/jOkSWvB400— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 7, 2025
◆Five years later, COVID-19 continues to leave its mark on Albertans【CBC : Jennifer Lee 2025年3月5日】
Five years after the province identified its first COVID-19 case, Albertans are being urged not to lose sight of those still struggling with its devastating impacts.
In a moment few Albertans will forget, Dr. Deena Hinshaw — Alberta’s then chief medical officer of health — took to the podium on March 5, 2020, to announce that a woman in her 50s had tested positive after returning from a cruise.
It was the province’s first presumptive COVID-19 case.
Since then, 6,691 Albertans have died due to the illness. And while deaths and hospitalizations have dropped significantly, COVID-19 continues to kill hundreds of Albertans every year.
“This is not a disease that has come and gone. It’s unfortunately something that’s left its mark on Alberta,” said Craig Jenne, professor in the department of microbiology, immunology and infectious diseases at the University of Calgary.
“The pandemic has ended but, unfortunately, the endemic stage has now begun. And this is a virus that we’re going to have to deal with basically every year moving forward.”
And while many expected SARS-CoV-2 would eventually become a seasonal virus, similar to influenza, that hasn’t truly happened.
“It’s not like the flu,” said Sarah Otto, a professor at the University of British Columbia who specializes in mathematical modelling.
“It’s so transmissible and so easy to get that people are getting it … multiple times a year.”
Otto, an evolutionary biologist, is one of several Canadian scientists tracking COVID-19 variants.
“We’re not seeing it go away in the summer. It goes through these little undulations as new variants evolve and we see a little uptick. But then people’s immunity builds and it goes down again. And that’s happening year after year.”
Prior to the pandemic, the leading cause of death due to infectious diseases in Canada was influenza, according to Jenne.
That has changed.
“Last year alone, COVID killed more than four times as many Albertans as flu,” said Jenne, who is also the deputy director of the Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases.
“[It] continues to be a significant threat to people that have underlying health conditions, older and — to a certain extent — younger Albertans.”
Long COVID continues
And the pandemic has left another mark: long COVID.
Estimates about its prevalence vary, but according to a national survey involving Statistics Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada, 19 per cent of Canadians infected with SARS-CoV-2 reported experiencing long-term symptoms (for three or more months) in 2023.
“As of June 2023, about 100,000 Canadian adults have been unable to return to work or school because of their symptoms,” the report said.
The most common symptoms reported are fatigue, brain fog and shortness of breath.
But other problems can occur as well, according to doctors, including uncontrolled and rapid increases in heart rate, known as tachycardia. It can be triggered by activities as simple as standing up and walking into another room.
Prior to the pandemic, Dr. Satish Raj, a Calgary-based cardiologist, was already treating patients with similar problems after viral infections. The condition is known as POTS.
“What was different about COVID wasn’t that this type of thing had never happened before, but that it had never happened before on the scale, societally, as it happened with COVID,” said Raj, a University of Calgary professor and medical director of the Calgary autonomic investigation and management clinic.
He estimates five to 10 per cent of Albertans have ongoing symptoms after a COVID infection, and up to two per cent are so debilitated they can’t go to work or school.
His waitlist has grown since COVID-19 hit and is now close to two years.
“In our desire to move on and get past it, I think we’re forgetting some of the people who have been wounded by it,” said Raj.
“We’re not necessarily showing a commitment to providing the resources to help them to continue to be part of society.”
Last year, Alberta Health Services shuttered its long COVID outpatient program, which provided multi-disciplinary specialized care.
Care is less co-ordinated now, said Raj.
“I think there’s a major domino effect by getting rid of those clinics — not just for the patients for whom they’re caring — but as an information resource for physician and providers.”
In a statement, Alberta Health Services said most people can manage symptoms at home and people should start by contacting their primary care provider or Health Link for support.
Meanwhile, with testing no longer easily accessible to the public, confirming a diagnosis of long COVID is increasingly difficult, according to Dr. Grace Lam, a University of Alberta respirologist.
“It makes it really quite challenging to pin down how many Albertans are still suffering with this or are newly developing this at this point.”
Lam, who also treats long COVID patients, worries about people being infected multiple times.
“With repeated infections, your risk of long COVID does increase,” she said.
But there is hope, according to Lam, who said clinical trials are exploring treatment options.
Meanwhile, reflecting on the past five years, Jenne pointed to what he sees as key achievements, including global surveillance and co-operation that led to the rapid development and deployment of vaccines.
“We were able to dramatically impact the number of lives lost,” he said.
“There’s a lot of lessons in there as we move forward knowing that, unfortunately, it’s only a matter of time before another virus shows up and creates a significant public health threat.”
COVID-19は5年経っても終わらず
-過去28日間で3,000人死亡(米国2,700人)
-Long COVIDは10-35%に発症、多くが働けず「実質的な障害」に
-「多くの若く健康だった人が今は動けず、診療もオンラインで受けるしかない」
-血栓異常が原因の可能性、治療法は未確立— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 11, 2025
◆Structural brain changes in post-COVID condition and its relationship with cognitive impairment【ABC 7 NewYork 2025年3月14日】
NEW YORK (WABC) — March marks five years since the COVID-19 virus took hold in the New York City metropolitan area, leading to a lockdown and tens of thousands of deaths.
While the world might not be in a global pandemic anymore, Sean Clarke, a professor of nursing leadership at New York University, said COVID is still a constant presence.
“The virus is still persistent and still moving. It’s still not a trivial thing,” Clarke told ABC News. “It hasn’t vanished, it’s just at a different point.”
Since 2020, over 7 million lives have been lost to the virus, according to the World Health Organization. And lives continue to be lost.
There have been more than 3,000 COVID-19 deaths over the last 28 days, with U.S. accounting for 2,700 of those deaths, according to WHO.
While COVID-19 vaccines are available for adults and children, vaccination rates are low. As of February 22, fewer than 25% of adults were vaccinated with the updated 2024-25 COVID-19 vaccine, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In addition to active COVID-19 cases, many patients have reported experiencing long COVID-19, where symptoms continue for years after the initial infection. According to the Mayo Clinic, some researchers have estimated that 10% to 35% of people who have had COVID-19 went on to have long COVID.
Symptoms of COVID
The following list from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not include all possible symptoms. Symptoms may change with new COVID-19 variants and can vary depending on vaccination status. Possible symptoms include:
Fever or chills
Cough
Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
Sore throat
Congestion or runny nose
New loss of taste or smell
Fatigue
Muscle or body aches
Headache
Nausea or vomiting
DiarrheaCOVID isolation guidelines
COVID-19’s health impacts are now similar to other respiratory viruses, like flu, which are also important causes of illness and death, especially for people at higher risk. As a result, the CDC has shifted to unified Respiratory Virus Guidance, rather than additional guidance for each specific virus.
The updated Respiratory Virus Guidance recommends that people stay home and away from others until at least 24 hours after both their symptoms are getting better overall, and they have not had a fever (and are not using fever-reducing medication).
Frequently Asked Questions about COVID
Here are answers to what doctors say are some of the most common questions they still get about COVID-19 – and a few questions they wish they were hearing more often.
Do I really need another vaccination?
It’s the most common question Lee gets from patients and families, and one Dr. Susan Fuchs, an attending physician in the emergency department at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, hears variations of.
Some people ask her, “Is a vaccine worth it?” The answer is yes, said Fuchs, who also is a professor of pediatrics at the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago.
Fuchs acknowledged that the vaccines don’t stop every case – she’s been vaccinated and had COVID-19 twice herself. But vaccines protect against severe illness, hospitalization and death, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which recommends vaccination for everybody 6 months or older.
Are COVID-19 vaccines safe?
Fuchs wishes more people would come to her with their worries about vaccine safety and side effects. Most people, she said, endure little more than a sore arm or a low-grade fever. Other common side effects include muscle pain, joint pain, fatigue, headache or chills.
“There are minor side effects with most vaccines,” Fuchs said. “But it’s better than getting the actual illness.”
The approved vaccines are still being monitored, she said. And “right now, we’re saying it’s a safe vaccine – no matter which one you get from whichever company.”
Who has the answers about boosters or other concerns?
Fuchs said that while people don’t ask about the emergence of different COVID-19 variants the way they once did, people can easily become confused about how often they need their vaccination updated.
Her advice: “Go to your family doctor.”
Lee said it’s easy for people to feel overwhelmed when there are “so many different sources coming at you all at once.” She regularly hears from patients or family members who have a concern they’ve heard from friends or at church or read online that they want to check with her. “I absolutely love and welcome those conversations,” she said.
Will I ever get better?
Most of the patients Hsu interacts with have long COVID, an assortment of symptoms that continue four weeks or more after the initial infection. People who have it ask him, “Is this going to shorten my life? Do people get better?”
Researchers don’t have all the answers to that, Hsu said. But large numbers of people – many of them previously young, active and healthy – “are now effectively disabled because of long COVID.”
Some people with long COVID – maybe a third – have gotten better, he said, but “I think the majority of people are still dealing with ongoing symptoms and are nowhere near back toward their baseline.”
Researchers are learning how the virus can persist in the body for years, Hsu said, and they’ve seen hints that abnormal blood clotting may be at the root of some problems.
He’s hopeful that treatments will be found, but at the moment, the answers about long COVID remind him of how doctors felt at the start of the pandemic. “We want to help, but we don’t have effective therapies to help just yet.”
He wishes more people were asking questions about how to limit the spread of the virus. People who have had a mild case of COVID-19 might not be as afraid of getting reinfected, Hsu said.
But risks of heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure and other conditions increase after an infection, he said. And each infection could become severe or lead to long COVID.
He emphasized how serious long COVID can be. Some of his patients are formerly high-energy, highly accomplished people who now are so drained that they can’t get out of bed to come to his clinic. “I can only see them virtually, and it’s just devastating.”
How can I protect myself and the people around me?
Like Hsu, Lee said she wished she heard this question more often.
“Even before COVID, this would come up with the flu shot,” Lee said. “Young, healthy people would say, ‘Well, you know, I don’t really get too sick from the flu. I don’t really have to worry about it.’ And my plea was always, ‘Well, think about your grandmother or your neighbor, or the person who you work with,'” or someone who cares for a child with a disability at home.
According to the CDC, age is the strongest risk factor for severe COVID-19, and the risk grows higher the older someone gets. Other high-risk groups include people with underlying conditions such as heart disease, people on dialysis and those with suppressed immune systems.
Staying up to date with vaccinations is one important way to protect them, Hsu said.
“I’m not one who just blindly says everyone should get a vaccine,” he said. “I do understand everyone has their own approach to weighing the risks and benefits of the vaccine. My concern is that the risks of the vaccine are real but have been overstated by influential voices on social media.”
Beyond vaccines, Lee said that advice from the pandemic’s peak on limiting the spread of the virus holds up. “If you’re sick, stay home. If somebody is sick, don’t let them come visit you.”
She acknowledged the importance of staying socially connected, especially for older people. “I do want people to visit their older adults in their lives and spend time with them and pick up the phone and talk with them, because I think the flip side to people being too cautious or too scared about getting someone sick is the social isolation.”
But, she added, “I want them to do it safely, when everyone’s feeling good.”
COVID-19 and the flu are similar in that some people might dismiss them if they’ve had only mild cases in the past, Lee said. But both can be deadly. And even when they aren’t fatal, a case of either that requires hospitalization can have many unintended consequences, especially for older adults, sometimes leading to lasting disability.
“That’s something a lot of people don’t consider,” Lee said, “and it’s not something most people want to face.”
Fuchs said parents should not send their children back to school until they have been fever-free for 24 hours without medication. And she still wears a mask at work because she doesn’t want to spread COVID-19 from patient to patient.
Hsu’s recommendation is “if it’s clear that cases are rising, then it may be a good time to be more mindful about wearing a mask in public” and to make sure large gatherings are held either outdoors or in a well-ventilated area.
“I also think it’s really important to take care of ourselves and our bodies better,” Hsu said, with a healthy diet, regular exercise and medical checkups. “I do think that these measures can make us more resilient to an infection.”
Lee seconded Hsu’s advice for getting up to date with any routine health screenings that might have been delayed during the pandemic. That can be a good time to raise whatever COVID-19 concerns someone might have, she said.
“It’s stressful to try to make sense of all the things that you hear or read,” Lee said, but there’s an easy way to avoid that stress over health concerns. “Pick up the phone and make an appointment.”
日本の調査で判明
-オミクロン軽症でも35.5%がLong COVIDに
-40歳以上は神経症状4.5倍・呼吸器症状3.8倍のリスク
-抗ウイルス薬の使用で呼吸器症状リスク低下か?
-「軽症なら大丈夫」は誤り、感染回避が最善策https://t.co/KTdsYr9dBT— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 11, 2025
◆Analysis of risk factors for long COVID after mild COVID-19 during the Omicron wave in Japan【ScienceDirect 2025年3月5日】
Abstract
Background
Post-COVID-19 syndrome, referred to as “long COVID,” is characterized by persistent symptoms that develop during or after SRAS-CoV-2 infection lasting for ≥12 weeks, which cannot be explained by factors other than COVID-19. Previous studies before the Omicron pandemic have identified female sex, older age (≥50 years), severity of illness, obesity, diabetes, and smoking as risk factors for long COVID. However, data on long COVID following the emergence of the Omicron variants are limited.
Methods
An online survey was conducted among outpatients diagnosed with mild COVID-19 at 14 participating institutions in Japan between July 30, 2022, and December 31, 2023.
Results
Of the included 246 cases, 76 (35.5%) experienced at least one long COVID symptom 12 weeks after onset. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥40 years was significantly associated with an increased risk of respiratory (odds ratio [OR]: 3.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67–8.65) and neurologic symptoms (OR: 4.53, 95% CI: 1.84–11.13). Conversely, antiviral drug use was associated with a decreased risk of respiratory symptoms (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.93).
Conclusion
Caution is warranted when treating patients over 40 years of age with mild COVID-19 due to their higher susceptibility to developing long COVID. Antiviral drugs may be beneficial in managing respiratory symptoms and mitigating disease severity.
Long COVID、ME/CFSの共通原因は「mTORC1の過剰活性化」か?
-ミトコンドリア修復が阻害され、慢性疲労・ブレインフォグ・免疫異常を引き起こす可能性
-肥満・糖尿病・女性ホルモンの影響もmTORC1経路と関連
-治療候補: ラパマイシン類、ケトン食、ミトコンドリア修復療法https://t.co/GDExWfbGZ3— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 11, 2025
◆mTORC1 syndrome (TorS): unifying paradigm for PASC, ME/CFS and PAIS【BMC Journal of Translational Medicine 2025年3月10日】
Abstract
Post-acute SarS-Cov2 (PASC), Myalgia encephalomyelitis/Chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and Post-acute infection syndrome (PAIS) consist of chronic post–acute infectious syndromes, sharing exhaustive fatigue, post exertional malaise, intermittent pain, postural tachycardia and neuro-cognitive-psychiatric dysfunction. However, the concerned shared pathophysiology is still unresolved in terms of upstream drivers and transducers. Also, risk factors which may determine vulnerability/progression to the chronic phase still remain to be defined. In lack of drivers and a cohesive pathophysiology, the concerned syndromes still remain unmet therapeutic needs. ‘mTORC1 Syndrome’ (TorS) implies an exhaustive disease entity driven by sustained hyper-activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin C1 (mTORC1), and resulting in a variety of disease aspects of the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, some cancers, neurodegeneration and other [Bar-Tana in Trends Endocrinol Metab 34:135–145, 2023]. TorS may offer a cohesive insight of PASC, ME/CFS and PAIS drivers, pathophysiology, vulnerability and treatment options.
ロングコロナの最大のリスク要因は「女性、中年、高BMI」ですが、BMIがどう関係するのかという質問をよくいただきます。これは、
①IL-6などの炎症性サイトカインが多く、慢性炎症の傾向があるから— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 11, 2025
②インスリン抵抗性が高いのでウイルスに糖代謝をハイジャックされやすいから(高血糖はウイルス複製を加速)
③前のツイで紹介した通り、mTORC1が過剰活性化してミトコンドリアが抑制されているから
④血管障害リスクが高いから
⑤サイトカインバランスの異常で免疫機能が低下しているから— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 11, 2025
つまり、高BMIは「炎症+代謝異常+免疫低下+血管障害」の複合要因です。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 11, 2025
元々生野菜と青果の消費が多い人はコロナウイルスに感染しても重症化率が低く(ヴィーガンまでいく必要はない)、また、定期的な運動習慣のある人はロングコロナになりにくいか、回復が早いことがわかっています(過去ツイ参照)。また、元々の精神疾患はリスク要因です(過去ツイ参照)。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 11, 2025
ロングコロナのリスクは高BMIとか定期的な運動をしないこととか最近色々投稿してますが、まあ要するに所謂「健康体」、つまりホメオスタシスの中央からロングコロナになるとズレてしまうので、元々中央の辺りにいた方が安全だしブレが治りやすいということでしょうね。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
新しい病気の予後について、その病気が発生してから5年の間に分かることは、感染してから5年後までのことだけです。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
コロナウイルスはただの風邪、という言説を一言で否定すると、「極めて強固なサブゲノムRNAを細胞内に残すのはコロナウイルス種だけ」ということになります。これは否定しようのない事実です。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
そして、新型コロナウイルスのサブゲノムRNAはさらに強固になっています。どう強固でどう問題なのかは過去ツイ参照。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
コロナウイルスを寄生虫に例えると、除虫薬で排出した後も足や触覚などの虫の部品が体に残り続け、炎症を起こし続けるという状態がロングコロナの一種類です。この部品はめちゃくちゃ硬いので、免疫では破壊できず、「虫」ではないので除虫薬も効かないということで治りにくくなっています。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
こういうめちゃくちゃ硬い部品を残すよう進化したのはコロナウイルス種の特徴で、一度感染した人を弱めておくことで再び戻ってきやすいように進化した結果と思われます。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
コロナウイルスが元々住んでいたと思われるコウモリはほとんど適応免疫がなく常に自然免疫で対応します。例えると、異分子を発見すると特殊部隊を送る代わりに、常に大量の警官が巡回していて、それで直ちに対応するスタイルです。サブゲノムRNAはこういった”厳しい環境”で生まれた適応と考えられます
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
コウモリの免疫は人間とは根本的な設計思想が違っていて、感染は許すけど増殖は許さない、という発想で常ににインターフェロンが大量に出ており、しかも飛翔するたびに体温が30度前後から40度異常まで上昇します。コウモリの強みは自分自身の免疫に炎症を起こさないという点で、
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
人間がこのように進化することはないと思われます。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
サブゲノムRNAを破壊するような細胞内の”免疫”はオートファジーと呼ばれ、主に①異物にラベルをつけて効率的に排除する方法と、②ランダムに巡回する”ルンバ”が偶然見つけて溶かす方法の二種類があります。オートファジーのレポートで紹介した通り、①の方法でコロナウイルスのサブゲノムRNAを
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
排除しようとすると、7350万世帯の年間電力消費量に匹敵するエネルギーが必要になります。要するに不可能で、これがまさにコロナウイルスが進化で獲得した能力です。②の方法をなんとか効率化するしか手はありません。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
このサブゲノムRNAがあるのがコロナウイルス。ないのが「ただの風邪」です。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
こういう情報を受け入れるには色々心理的な抵抗感があると思いますが、これがまさにサブゲノムRNAやロングコロナなどの重要な情報が控えられてる理由だと思います。不安を煽るな、パニックを煽るな、ということです。でも、医学論文ではもうコロナウイルスの前提として定義されています。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
SARS-CoV-2gが通常とは異なる環状RNAを形成することが判明
-circSARS-CV2-N1368が血管細胞の炎症・酸化ストレスを促進
-TLR4/NF-κB/ROS経路を活性化 → 慢性血管障害の原因に
-長期に血中に残り、ロングコロナの血管ダメージに関与https://t.co/7ZjGjQFq6K— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
一つ前のツイは結構ショッキングな研究で、新型コロナウイルスがバクテリアのようなリング状のRNAを形成することがわかったというものです。コロナウイルス種で環状RNAを作るのは新型が初めてで、宿主の体に何らかの持続性の影響を与えるよう進化した結果であると見られます。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
結構衝撃的というか信じ難いですね。そこまでして感染者の細胞に残りたいのか、という感じです。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
◆mTORC1 syndrome (TorS): unifying paradigm for PASC, ME/CFS and PAIS【nature : acta pharmacologica sinica 2025年3月11日】
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 can encode circular RNAs (circRNAs); however, the potential effects of exogenous SARS-CoV-2 circRNAs on cardiovascular sequelae remain unknown. Three circRNAs derived from the nucleocapsid (N) gene of SARS-CoV-2, namely, circSARS-CV2-Ns, were identified for functional studies. In particular, circSARS-CV2-N1368 was shown to enhance platelet adhesiveness to endothelial cells (ECs) and inhibit EC-dependent vascular relaxation. Moreover, exogenous expression of circSARS-CV2-N1368 suppressed EC proliferation and migration and decreased angiogenesis and cardiac organoid beating. Mechanistically, we elucidated that circSARS-CV2-N1368 sponged the microRNA miR-103a-3p, which could reverse circSARS-CV2-N1368-induced EC damage. Additionally, activating transcription factor 7 (ATF7) was identified as a target gene of miR-103a-3p, and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) was verified as a downstream gene of ATF7 that mediates circARS-CV2-N1368-induced activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling and ROS production in ECs. Importantly, the reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger NAC mitigated the circSARS-CV2-N1368-promoted EC impairment. Our findings reveal that the TLR4/NF-κB/ROS signal pathway is critical for mediating circSARS-CV2-N1368-promoted oxidative damage in ECs, providing insights into the endothelial impairment caused by circSARS-CV2-Ns.
SARS-CoV-2が感覚神経に直接感染し、痛覚受容体TRPV1を活性化 → 軸索破壊 & 神経炎症を誘発
-オミクロンBA.5で神経細胞のACE2が増加 → ウイルスが直接感染
-TRPV1(カプサイシン受容体)が活性化、軸索変性・慢性痛・脳機能障害の原因に
-ロングコロナの神経症状の鍵か?https://t.co/M4r41sxSk1— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
◆SARS-CoV-2 Infects Peripheral Sensory Neurons and Promotes Axonal Degeneration via TRPV1 Activation【bioRxiv 2025年3月10日】
Summary
Common neurological symptoms of COVID-19, such as anosmia, headaches, and cognitive dysfunction, depend on interactions between the peripheral and central nervous systems. However, the molecular mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 affects the peripheral nervous system remain poorly understood, with ongoing debate about whether sensory neurons can be directly infected by the virus. In this study, human iPSC-derived sensory neurons were exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 BA.5 variant, a mutant virus, or viral S1 proteins. Under control conditions, sensory neurons exhibited low expression of ACE2. However, exposure to BA.5 or S1 proteins significantly upregulated ACE2 expression in peripherin-positive sensory neurons. Virological analysis confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 directly infects TRPV1-expressing sensory neurons, including olfactory neurons. Moreover, exposure to the live virus or S1 proteins induced TRPV1 upregulation and translocation from the nucleus to the cytosol, resulting in axonal destruction. Single-nucleus transcriptomic analysis revealed that viral exposure enhanced cAMP signaling, virus receptor and transmembrane transporter activities, and inflammatory regulation of TRP channels, which collectively contributed to synaptic and axonal damage. Importantly, treatment with a TRPV1 antagonist demonstrated neuroprotective effects. These findings underscore the need for further research into the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and TRPV1, as well as its downstream signaling pathways, to develop therapeutic strategies for preventing sensory neuron loss during viral infections.
サブゲノムRNAやミトコンドリア異常などは、もう絶望だとかもうダメだとか大雑把な極論に走るためではなく、サブゲノムRNAとは何なのか、ミトコンドリアDNAはどう働くのか、などを調べる契機になればと思って書いてます。知識が増えればいじれる変数も増えます。真理は細部に宿ります。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 12, 2025
人間とコウモリの免疫の根本的な違いに関する投稿が少し注目を集めましたが、コウモリが誕生したのは約5000万年前。免疫が今のようになるのに2000万年かかったとしても、人類の祖先が誕生したのはたった600万年前です。しかもコウモリの世代交代は人間よりも10倍以上はやいので、
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 13, 2025
人間が追いつくのは実質的に無理です。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 13, 2025
ロングコロナ患者の上咽頭にSARS-CoV-2 RNAが残存し、炎症を引き起こす
-ウイルスRNAが長期間残留 → 慢性炎症(IL-6, TNF-α活性化)を誘導
-上咽頭擦過療法(EAT)がウイルスRNAを除去し、炎症を軽減
-慢性疲労・ブレインフォグ・自律神経障害の治療法となる可能性https://t.co/y91t5hpoEg— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 13, 2025
◆Spatial transcriptomics of the epipharynx in long COVID identifies SARS-CoV-2 signalling pathways and the therapeutic potential of epipharyngeal abrasive therapy【nature scientific reports 2025年3月12日】
Abstract
In this study, the critical role of the epipharynx in managing long-term coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and in particular, how residual SARS-CoV-2 RNA affects signalling pathways in the epipharynx were investigated via spatial gene expression analysis (Visium HD). Moreover, we hypothesize that epipharyngeal abrasive therapy (EAT) targeting the epipharynx could improve long COVID symptoms by modulating local inflammation and gene expression. We conducted a comparative analysis of the gene expression profiles of three patients with long COVID and two control individuals without COVID-19. Residual SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the epipharynx of patients with long COVID, along with the activation of signalling pathways in epithelial and immune cells. After EAT, the viral RNA was either completely cleared or significantly reduced. T-cell receptor signalling pathways were suppressed; the levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α, were reduced; and excessive antibody production was mitigated. Histology showed that EAT effectively eliminated the inflamed, dysfunctional ciliated epithelium. This study clarifies that SARS-CoV-2 has long-term effects on the immune response in the epipharynx, emphasizing the need to focus on chronic epipharyngitis as a potential cause of long COVID. Furthermore, EAT may offer a promising approach to alleviating persistent long COVID symptoms.
小児COVID-19患者の43.7%が脳の異常を示す
-96研究のメタ解析で脳スキャン異常が判明
-脳血管障害(8.2%)・自己免疫炎症(ADEM 7.7%)・脳炎(13.9%)・脊髄炎(4.6%)
-コロナが小児の脳に長期的な影響を与える可能性
-発達や認知への影響を評価する長期研究が必要https://t.co/VQC8X1LOUo— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 13, 2025
◆Neuroimaging findings in children with COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis【nature scientific reports 2025年2月27日】
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted individuals differently, and there’s been a growing body of evidence pointing to neurological complications caused by the virus. However, our understanding of the range of neurological issues linked to SARS-CoV-2 infection in children is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the abnormal neuroimaging findings in pediatric COVID-19 patients, shedding light on this crucial aspect of the disease’s impact on children. We conducted an extensive search in the PubMed, Medline, and ScienceDirect databases for observational studies reporting neuroimaging findings of the brain and spinal cord in children with COVID-19 between December 1, 2019, and October 30, 2021. Grey literature sources, including medRxiv and Google Scholar, were also explored. Pooled proportions of abnormal neuroimaging findings, categorized into neurovascular findings, ADEM-like lesions, encephalitic pattern, myelitis, transient splenial lesions, and other anomalies, were calculated using a random-effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 statistic for pooled proportions and the inconsistency index I2. The Quality of the studies was evaluated using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool and the adapted Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Our search yielded 9,605 articles, with 96 studies (involving 327 pediatric patients) included in the qualitative analysis. Of these, five reports (encompassing 111 patients) underwent quantitative analysis. The pooled proportion of pediatric COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms and exhibiting abnormal neuroimaging findings was 43.74%. These findings were further categorized into neurovascular findings (8.22%), ADEM-like lesions (7.69%), encephalitic pattern (13.95%), myelitis (4.60%), transient splenial lesions (16.26%), and other abnormalities (12.03%). Insignificant between-study heterogeneity was observed in all categories, and our analysis did not reveal significant publication bias. In conclusion, a substantial proportion of pediatric COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms have abnormal neuroimaging findings, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring of neurological complications in this vulnerable population. Standardized reporting and long-term follow-up studies are essential to fully understand the implications of these findings. Collaborative research efforts will deepen our understanding of COVID-19’s neurological dimensions in children and enhance clinical care for this population.
回復後7.5%の成人にSARS-CoV-2スパイクタンパクが残存
-脳神経症状(OR 4.5)、心肺症状(OR 4.8)、筋骨格系症状(OR 5.5)と関連
-疲労・消化器症状とは関連せず
-ロングコロナの症状ごとに異なるメカニズムが関与かhttps://t.co/4JB6FaH6yl— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 14, 2025
◆Post-Acute SARS-CoV-2 Antigenemia Is Associated With Some but Not All Long COVID Symptoms【CROI 2025年3月12日】
Abstract
Background
SARS-CoV-2 (SCV2) RNA and antigens can be found in several tissues many months after infection, but whether SCV2 persistence causes Long COVID (LC) is unproven. The scant data in favor of causation has related persistent SCV2 to non-specific LC definitions. It is unknown whether persistent SCV2 is associated with all, or only some, of the different symptoms of this heterogenous condition.
Methods
Sampling from UCSF’s LIINC cohort, we defined 5 LC case groups and 1 non-LC control group. Consistent with the NASEM definition, LC groups had ≥1 symptom in a given grouping that was rated “very bothersome” at ≥2 visits 3-14 months after the first confirmed SCV2 infection. LC case groups were: a) neurologic (headache, brain fog or dizziness); b) cardiopulmonary (cough, dyspnea, chest pain or palpitations); c) gastrointestinal (GI; nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, belly pain or appetite loss); d) musculoskeletal (back, joint or muscle pain); and e) fatigue. The non-LC group was those whose acute symptoms resolved within 30 days of infection and who had no symptoms 3-14 months post-infection. SCV2 spike, S1, and nucleocapsid (N) antigens were measured in plasma by single molecule array (Simoa) assay. Odds ratios (OR) were used to relate antigenemia at any visit 3-14 months post-infection to concurrent symptoms.
Results
Spike antigenemia was found in 7.5% (3/40) of the non-LC group. In unadjusted analyses, spike antigenemia was associated with neurologic, cardiopulmonary, and musculoskeletal symptoms but not GI or fatigue (Table). After adjustment for confounding, associations endured for neurologic (OR 4.5, p=0.037), cardiopulmonary (OR 4.8, p=0.08), and musculoskeletal (OR 5.5, p=0.049) symptoms. After exclusion of timepoints within 1 month of known SCV2 vaccination or reinfection, point estimates were similar but confidence intervals widened slightly. No significant associations were seen with S1 or N antigens.
Conclusions
Among adults with prior SCV2 infection, we found evidence for an association between SCV2 spike antigenemia 3-14 months post-infection and some but not all LC symptoms. This work highlights the need for well-characterized participants, with and without a variety of symptoms, to yield associations, and it suggests that different mechanisms might contribute to the variable presentation of LC. Nonetheless, given the novelty of the system, more work is needed (including intervention studies) to confirm the findings and exclude confounding before causation is inferred.
ロングコロナの「労作後疲労(PEM)」は代謝・免疫異常と関連
-エネルギー代謝異常(糖・脂質・TCA回路の乱れ)
-免疫と血液凝固の異常(HIF-1, GAPDH, S100-A9上昇)
-特定のバイオマーカーでPEMを97.8%の精度で識別可能
-PEM治療には「代謝+免疫」の両面アプローチが必要か?https://t.co/mSM4VWfxpr— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 14, 2025
◆Exploring the Molecular Pathways of Long COVID With Post-Exertional Fatigue: A Multiomic Approach【CROI 2025年3月12日】
Abstract
Background
Post-exertional malaise (PEM) is a disabling condition characterized by worsened symptoms after mental or physical exertion, commonly seen in Long-COVID (LC). While its underlying pathophysiology is unclear, potential mechanisms include oxidative stress, and metabolic derangements. We conducted a multiomic analysis to identify changes in energy metabolism, immune function and cellular stress responses in patients with LC affected by PEM (LC-PEM).
Methods
We included 25 LC-PEM and 25 COVID-19 survivors without persistent symptoms (Recovered) matched by sex, age and COVID-19 severity. We detected the levels in plasma of 6 short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) by GC-MS/MS, 95 metabolites by GC-qTOF and 795 proteins in the proteomic analysis by nanoLC-MS/MS. Statistical analyses included t-tests, partial-least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), Random Forest, Joint-Pathway analyses (KEGG database) and ROC Curve.
Results
Acetic acid was the only SCFA with lower levels in the LC-PEM group (p=0.001). Metabolomics revealed 29 differentially expressed metabolites (23 increased, 6 decreased in LC-PEM, all p<0.04), while proteomics showed 51 differentially expressed proteins between groups (39 increased and 11 decreased, p<0.01 in all cases). In a multiomic analysis, the PLS-DA of the identified 81 significant compounds demonstrated clear separation between groups (Fig1A). The enrichment pathway analysis identified 25 affected pathways, including complement and coagulation cascades, glucagon signalling pathway, TCA cycle, pyruvate metabolism, fatty acid biosynthesis, different amino acid metabolisms, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, HIF-1 signalling pathway, butanoate metabolism and glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism. Random Forest highlighted glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Protein S100-A9, Fumaric acid and Galectin-3-binding protein as most associated with LC-PEM. The ROC curve analysis of the combination of 4 compounds yielded an AUC of 0.978 (95% CI: 0.942–1.013, p<0.001, Fig1B), indicating an excellent discriminatory ability between the LC-PEM and recovered groups. Conclusions
Coagulation and inflammatory problems linked to metabolic changes, such as upregulated glycolysis and fatty acid synthesis, are associated with LC-PEM. These findings highlight the need for a multifaceted approach addressing both metabolic and immunological factors. Future research should validate these biomarkers in larger cohorts and explore targeted treatments to address these imbalances.
ロングコロナを99%の精度で診断可能なバイオマーカーを特定
-100名のLC患者・60名の回復者・60名の未感染者の血液を分析
-血小板・好中球の活性化、TCA回路異常、血管・脂質代謝の変化を検出
-機械学習モデルでLCを99%の精度で判別可能https://t.co/WAI25jJLxb— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 14, 2025
◆Novel Plasma Biomarkers for the Detection of Long COVID Defined by Multiapproach Analysis【CROI 2025年3月12日】
Abstract
Background
Long COVID (LC) is a newly defined syndrome linking COVID infection with an umbrella of long-lasting symptoms. Due to this variety of presentation and lack of understanding of the mechanism involved, no reliable biomarkers have been found so far, and diagnostic uncertainty remains high. In the prospect of personalized medicine, there is a dire need for diagnostic and prognostic markers. To address this issue, we designed a multi-approach exploratory study on a well characterized cohort of LC patients using Resolved COVID infections (RC) and Uninfected Controls (UC).
Methods
Plasma samples from 100 LC, 60 RC and 60 UC were analyzed by using state-of-the-art IVDr NMR allowing to harvest detailed lipidomic and metabolomic data and immune and mitochondrial stress markers explored by several multiplex ELISAs and electrochemiluminescent assays. On these data, we performed multivariate dimensionality reduction models (PCA, OPLS-DA) to visualize data distribution and discriminant variables between groups. Candidate biomarkers were validated with univariate analysis and ROC curve analysis, and then used to construct a machine deep learning model able to sort patients into diagnostic groups. Finally, LC symptoms were correlated with the most significant variables.
Results
We identified several potential biomarkers related to platelet and neutrophil activation, inflammation, TCA cycle, vascularization, lipoproteins. Models fed by those biomarkers alone were sufficient to cluster the LC group from the two other groups. We also found that both previously infected groups (RC and LC) had a specific signature distinguishing them from UC. SARS-CoV-2 infection induced host immuno-metabolic signatures that persisted after full recovery (RC group). However, this signature was different in the LC group and was associated with LC pathophysiology. We created several machine learning models to test whether these biomarkers along with the other variables are enough to predict LC patients. Our model was able to correctly predict 99% of LC patients and had about 70% accuracy in distinguishing RC from UC patients.
Conclusions
In this study, we identified potential biomarkers sufficient to diagnose LC with 99% accuracy. These biomarkers were associated with immune and metabolic dysregulation, as well as content symptoms, providing clues to future therapeutic targets. We are now testing these markers in a prospective setting to validate their use in clinical practice.
COVID-19後、脳の白質損傷が確認される
– 拡散MRI研究で脳の神経回路(白質)の劣化が判明
– 重症者ほど異常が多発、炎症が関与か?
– 一部は時間経過で改善も、2年後も悪化が続く例もhttps://t.co/O8GuoK8Qk6— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 18, 2025
◆Diffusion tensor imaging after COVID-19 infection: A systematic review【ScienceDirect 2025年3月15日】
Abstract
Background
Most COVID-19 neuroimaging research focuses on clinically evident lesions occurring during the acute period after infection. Chronic effects on brain structure, especially at a microstructural level, are less well defined. Existing advanced neuroimaging studies report inconsistent differences in white matter integrity after COVID-19 infection. Our aim was to systematically evaluate the advanced neuroimaging literature with a specific focus on examining diffusion MRI (dMRI) abnormalities observable after the resolution of the acute phase of COVID-19 illness.
Methods
A search of the literature was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on May 27th, 2023, and an updated search was performed September 20th, 2024. Inclusion criteria were a quantitative comparison of dMRI metrics between COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 volunteers with MRI acquired >6 weeks after COVID-19. Studies that included only subgroups of COVID-19 patients with specific symptoms, case reports, and post-mortem studies were excluded. Forwards and backwards citation chasing were performed.
Results
The initial search identified 1709 unique records, and 11 met inclusion criteria. Most studies included hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with brain MRI acquired between 2 and 6 months after COVID-19 infection. The majority of studies reported lower fractional anisotropy and higher mean diffusivity in the post-COVID-19 cohort, compared to non-COVID-19 controls. However, there were inconsistent findings, with one study reporting higher fractional anisotropy after COVID-19 infection. Cohorts with a more severe acute COVID-19 illness tended to have lower fractional anisotropy and higher mean diffusivity than cohorts with a milder illness course. Compared to shorter follow-up periods, a longer time between COVID-19 and MRI was associated with fewer differences between COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 volunteers.
Conclusion
A review of the literature indicates that the heterogeneity of findings regarding dMRI metrics after the resolution of the acute phase of COVID-19 illness may be due in part to the severity of COVID-19 illness and the time between COVID-19 and MRI. Future studies should also consider how different SARS-CoV-2 variants differentially affect the structural brain differences after COVID-19.
SARS-CoV-2が胎盤に感染し、流産・死産リスクを3倍に
– 胎盤炎が妊娠合併症を引き起こす可能性
– 組織解析で、炎症・血栓形成・胎盤壊死が確認
– 母体が無症状でも影響が出るケースあり
– 妊娠中の感染リスクを軽視せず、経過観察が重要https://t.co/NEEVPHG264— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 18, 2025
シビアな内容の研究は無視したり自分とは関係ないと思い込もうとする人がいるんですが、気持ちを守るよりもまず現実を知って体を守ることが大事だと思います。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 18, 2025
◆SARS-CoV-2 Placentitis: A Review of Pathologic Findings and Discussion of Differential Diagnosis【ARCHIVES of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 2025年3月17日】
Abstract
Context.—
Maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with increased adverse events in the mother, as well as increased stillbirths (11.5 per 1000), spontaneous abortions, and premature delivery. Clinical symptomatology, or the lack thereof, does not appear to be directly related to fetal or neonatal complications. SARS-CoV-2 placentitis is now recognized as the culprit, and the presence of the virus in the syncytiotrophoblasts of the placenta has emerged as a significant predictor of fetal compromise.
Objective.—
To provide a review of the clinical presentation and outcomes, morphologic characteristics, detection methods, and differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 placentitis.
Data Sources.—
A case of placental pathology in a patient with COVID-19 infection at the University of Michigan, as well as a review of the available literature through a search of PubMed and Google Scholar.
Conclusions.—
SARS-CoV-2 placentitis is a well-documented outcome of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. It can disrupt placental function and lead to severe outcomes in the neonate, including growth restriction and stillbirths. Chronic histiocytic intervillositis, perivillous fibrin deposition, and trophoblast necrosis, when present together, may act as a morphologic signature of SARS-CoV-2 placentitis. The histologic differential diagnosis includes massive perivillous fibrin deposition (MPFD)/maternal floor infarction (MFI), chronic villitis of unknown origin, or other infectious villitides. Immunohistochemistry and RNA in situ hybridization are specific to the viral antibodies and RNA, respectively, and are essential for classification.
ロングコロナ2年後、24%が未回復 & 障害率が大幅増
– 認知障害 8.8% → 45.3%
– 歩行障害 12.7% → 40.0%
– 生活自立困難 4.7% → 20.7%
統計モデルで「ロングコロナが障害の原因」と確認https://t.co/tce84f7Uem— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 18, 2025
◆Long COVID and New Onset Disability Nearly 2 Years After Initial Infection【ScienceDirect 2025年3月17日】
Abstract
Introduction
The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of ongoing long COVID symptoms and related disability in a population-based cohort nearly 2 years after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Methods
Six domains of age-standardized disability (i.e., mobility, cognition, independent living, vision, hearing, self-care) were assessed by ongoing long COVID status using cohort data from a population-based survey of adults with COVID-19 onset from March–December 2020 in Michigan. Baseline data were collected June 2020–October 2021 and follow-up data were collected January–November 2022. Associations between ongoing long COVID and each domain of disability were also examined using adjusted modified Poisson regression models. Analyses were conducted 2024–2025.
Results
Nearly 2 years after initial infection, 24.0% of 1,547 respondents reported ongoing long COVID symptoms. When comparing disability status 4 weeks prior to COVID-19 illness to the time of the follow-up survey, respondents with ongoing long COVID symptoms had large increases in the prevalence of cognition (8.8% to 45.3%), mobility (12.7% to 40.0%), independent living (4.7% to 20.7%), and self-care (2.1% to 10.9%) disability, and more modest increases in the prevalence of vision and hearing disability. Respondents without ongoing long COVID symptoms experienced smaller increases in disability prevalence. In regression models, ongoing long COVID was associated with higher prevalence of all 6 disability domains.
Conclusions
The ongoing burden of long COVID and related disability is substantial and warrants increased attention by the public health and medical communities.
人間の注意力にはどうしても限界があって、鍛えて増やすというのもほとんど出来ない中で、コロナウイルスは鼻粘膜経路から感染しないと全身に拡散出来ないということがわかっているので、鼻経路以外の注意は「普通〜ちょい高め」くらいにしておいて、余力をN95マスクのチェックに向けた方が良いと思い
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 18, 2025
ます。色々使いましたが、1~2%の確率で生地が異常に薄かったり、紐の付け根に穴が空いている不良品があります。毎日つけると三ヶ月に一回くらい遭遇する頻度で、何となく周囲でマスクをつけている人の感染率と一致する気がして仕方ありません。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 18, 2025
ACE2がある限りどこにでも感染できるというのが誤解を生んでいるのかもしれません。どこにでも感染できるというのは鼻の繊毛細胞でまず増殖したあとの話で、最初のエントリーポイントの話ではありません。繊毛細胞を操作して粘液の流れを変えるという研究もありますが、どちらにしろまず鼻繊毛細胞です
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
麻疹、ノロウイルス、百日咳が流行ってるのは事実ですが、忘れてはいけないのは日本だけではないということです。イギリスでは少し前からこの傾向が始まり、アメリカでも同様です。何か共通の原因がある可能性を考慮しないといけません。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
新型コロナウイルスが全身に拡散するにはまず鼻の繊毛細胞で増殖する必要がある理由についてまだ確定的な研究はされてませんが、おそらくロジスティックな理由ではなく、ウイルスRNA自身を安定化させるのに必要なメチルドナーなどが豊富な環境を利用している可能性が高いと思います。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
鼻上皮細胞は常に外部の刺激に露出しているため、入れ替わりが激しく、遺伝子の状態を素早く整える必要があるのでヒストンやメチルドナーが非常に豊富にあります。コロナウイルスはインフルなどと同様にこれを利用して、スパイクプロテインの状態などを安定化させる”最終微調整”を行っていると思います
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
ロングコロナで脳幹の神経伝達が遅延、脳疲労と関連
– ABR検査で波Vの遅延 → 認知疲労(ブレインフォグ)と相関
– 若年層PASC患者は「脳の加齢パターン」を示し、聴覚処理に影響
– 耳鳴り38% vs 9%(対照群)で有意差、頻発するほど認知疲労が深刻https://t.co/cskRMH7Tln— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
◆Altered auditory brainstem responses are post-acute sequela of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC)【nature scientific reports 2025年3月18日】
Abstract
The Post-acute Sequela of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) syndrome, also known as Long-COVID, often presents with subjective symptoms such as brain fog and cognitive fatigue. Increased tinnitus, and decreased hearing in noise ability also occur with PASC, yet whether auditory manifestations of PASC are linked with the cognitive symptoms is not known. Electrophysiology, specifically the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), provides objective measures of auditory processing. We hypothesized that ABR findings would be linked to PASC and with subjective feelings of cognitive fatigue. Eighty-two individuals, 37 with PASC (mean age: 47.5, Female: 83%) and 45 healthy controls (mean age: 38.5, Female: 76%), were studied with an auditory test battery that included audiometry and ABR measures. Peripheral hearing thresholds did not differ between groups. The PASC group had a higher prevalence of tinnitus, anxiety, depression, and hearing handicap in addition to increased subjective cognitive fatigue. ABR latency findings showed a significantly greater increase in the wave V latency for PASC subjects when a fast (61.1 clicks/sec) compared to a slow click (21.1 clicks/sec) was used. The increase in latency correlated with cognitive fatigue scores and predicted PASC status. The ABR V/I amplitude ratio was examined as a measure of central gain. Although these ratios were not significantly elevated in the full PASC group, to minimize the cofounding effect of age, the cohort was median split on age. Elevated V/I amplitude ratios were significant predictors of both predicted PASC group classification and cognitive fatigue scores in the younger PASC subjects compared to age-matched controls providing evidence of elevated central gain in younger individuals with PASC. More frequent tinnitus also significantly predicted higher subjective cognitive fatigue scores. Our findings suggest that PASC may alter the central auditory pathway and lead to slower conduction and elevated auditory neurophysiology responses at the midbrain, a pattern associated with the typical aging process. This study marks a significant stride toward establishing an objective measure of subjective cognitive fatigue through assessment of the central auditory system.
コロナウイルス感染対策をやめた人の中には、帰ったら全身洗って持ち物も全て消毒しないといけず、感染してもしぬわけではない、から全てやめた、あるいは消毒したけど感染したことがあるからやめた、という滅茶苦茶現実から外れた判断をしてるケースがあるようですが、実際は鼻上皮細胞から感染した
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
場合しか全身に広がれず、重症化よりもロングコロナが本当の問題、というのが現実に即した認識です。
「騒ぎ過ぎ」と茶化す人はもしかしたら全消毒をしないと感染防止できないと思ってる類かも知れません。または、死亡だけが悪帰結だとまだ思ってるのかも知れません。(ソースは過去ツイ)— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
意外に知られていなくて少し驚いたんですが、新型コロナウイルスは鼻の繊毛細胞で一度増殖して粘液に乗って肺に到達しない限り全身に拡散できません。肺まで届くと心臓から中枢神経まで拡散することがあります。眼球なども直接感染できますが、そこで止まります。鼻が全てです。(ソースは過去ツイ)
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
※当然ながら口呼吸をしても鼻と口は空気を共有しているので感染防止にはなりません。
— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 19, 2025
SARS-CoV-2が動脈プラークに感染し、心筋梗塞・脳卒中リスクを高める
-動脈壁にウイルスが侵入 → プラーク細胞内で生存・増殖
-プラーク破裂を引き起こし、血流を遮断 → 心筋梗塞・脳卒中の原因に
-泡沫細胞(コレステロールを含む免疫細胞)がウイルスの隠れた貯蔵庫に?https://t.co/A3ypyDaT22— Angama (@Angama_Market) March 20, 2025
◆Now we know how COVID attacks your heart【NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC 2023年11月7日】
Scientists have noticed that COVID-19 can trigger serious cardiovascular problems, especially among older people who have a buildup of fatty material in their blood vessels. But now a new study has revealed why and shown that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, directly infects the arteries of the heart.
The study also found that the virus can survive and grow inside the cells that form plaque—the buildup of fat-filled cells that narrow and stiffen the arteries leading to atherosclerosis. If the plaque breaks, it can block blood flow and cause a heart attack or a stroke. The SARS-CoV-2 infection makes the situation worse by inflaming the plaque and increasing the chance that it breaks free.
This can explain long-term cardiovascular effects seen in some, if not all, COVID-19 patients.
SARS-CoV-2 virus has already been found to infect many organs outside the respiratory system. But until now it hadn’t been shown to attack the arteries.
“No one was really looking if there was a direct effect of the virus on the arterial wall,” says Chiara Giannarelli, a cardiologist at NYU Langone Health, in New York, who led the study. Giannarelli noted that her team detected viral RNA—the genetic material in the virus—in the coronary arteries. “You would not expect to see [this] several months after recovering from COVID.”
Mounting evidence now shows that SARS-CoV-2 is not only a respiratory virus, but it can also affect the heart and many other organ systems, says Ziyad Al-Aly, a clinical epidemiologist at Washington University in St. Louis. Al-Aly’s research has shown that the risk of developing heart and cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure, stroke, irregular heart rhythms, cardiac arrest, and blood clots increases two to five times within a year of COVID-19, even when the person wasn’t hospitalized.
“This important study links, for the first time, directly the SARS-CoV-2 virus with atherosclerotic plaque inflammation,” says Charalambos Antoniades, chair of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Virus triggers the inflammation in plaque
A recent study of more than 800,000 people led by Fabio Angeli, a cardiologist at University of Insubria in Varese, Italy, has shown that COVID-19 patients develop high blood pressure twice as often as others. More worrying is that the risk of cardiac diseases can also rise for patients who suffered only mild COVID symptoms.
“I saw a patient who now has a defibrillator, and she didn’t even have a severe [COVID] illness,” says Bernard Gersh, a cardiologist at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Wondering whether the cardiovascular damage during COVID was due to the virus directly attacking the blood vessels, the NYU team analyzed autopsied tissue from the coronary arteries and plaque of older people who had died from COVID-19. They found the virus was present in the arteries regardless of whether the fatty plaques were big or small.
“The original finding in this study is that the virus was convincingly found in the plaque in the coronary artery,” says Juan Carlos Kaski, a cardiovascular specialist at St George’s, University of London, who was not involved in the study.
The NYU team found that in the arteries, the virus predominantly colonized the white blood cells called macrophages. Macrophages are immune cells that are mobilized to fight off an infection, but these same cells also absorb excess fats—including cholesterol from blood. When microphages load too much fat, they change into foam cells, which can increase plaque formation.
To confirm that the virus was indeed infecting and growing in the cells of the blood vessels, scientists obtained arterial and plaque cells—including macrophages and foam cells—from healthy volunteers. Then they grew these cells in the lab in petri dishes and infected them with SARS-CoV-2.
Giannarelli found that although virus infected macrophages at a higher rate than other arterial cells, it did not replicate in them to form new infectious particles. But when the macrophages had become loaded with cholesterol and transformed into foam cells, the virus could grow, replicate, and survive longer.
“We found that the virus tended to persist longer in foam cells,” says Giannarelli. That suggests that foam cells might act as a reservoir of SARS-CoV-2. Since more fatty buildup would mean a greater number of foam cells, plaque can increase the persistence of the virus or the severity of COVID-19.
Scientists found that when macrophages and foam cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 they released a surge of small proteins known as cytokines, which signal the immune system to mount a response against a bacterial or viral infection. In arteries, however, cytokines boost inflammation and formation of even more plaque.
“We saw that there was a degree of inflammation [caused] by the virus that could aggravate atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events,” says Giannarelli.
These findings also confirm previous reports that measuring inflammation in the blood vessel wall can diagnose the extent of long-term cardiovascular complications after COVID-19, says Antoniades.
“What this study has found is that plaque rupture can be accelerated and magnified by the presence of the virus,” says Kaski.
Understanding heart diseases after COVID
While this new research clearly shows that SARS-CoV-2 can infect, grow, and persist in the macrophages of plaques and arterial cells, more studies are needed to fully understand the many ways COVID-19 can alter cardiac health.
“The NYU study identifies one potential mechanism, especially the viral reservoir, to explain the possible effects” says Gersh. “But It’s not going to be the only mechanism.”
This study only analyzed 27 samples from eight elderly deceased patients, all of whom already had coronary artery disease and were infected with the original strains of virus. So, the results of this study do not necessarily apply to younger people without coronary artery disease; or to new variants of the virus, which cause somewhat milder disease, says Angeli.
“We do not know if this will happen in people who have been vaccinated,” says Kaski. “There are lots of unknowns.”
It is also not clear whether and to what extent the high inflammatory reaction observed in the arteries of patients within six months after the infection, as shown in the new study, will last long-enough to trigger new plaque formation. “New studies are needed to show the time-course of the resolution of vascular inflammation after the infection,” says Antoniades.
COVID patients should watch for any new incidence of shortness of breath with exertion, chest discomfort, usually with exertion, palpitations, loss of consciousness; and talk to their physician about possible heart disease.